Typed relationships
Is-a, part-of, causes, aggravated-by, treats — every edge says what kind of link it is.
Turn any topic into a navigable concept map — typed relationships, grounded nodes, expandable branches.
01A session
Name a topic and pick a depth — focused (~10 nodes), detailed (~22) or comprehensive (~35); the topic sits at the centre of the graph.
Every edge carries a typed relation from a controlled set — is-a, part-of, causes, aggravated-by, pacified-by — grounded in the texts.
Expand the marked nodes to drill deeper into a branch, save the finished map to your library, or turn it into flashcards.
Each doṣa divides into five subtypes by seat and function — tap any node to expand it.
02What sets it apart
Is-a, part-of, causes, aggravated-by, treats — every edge says what kind of link it is.
Tap a node to grow it into its own sub-map without losing the whole.
Works with touch on a phone, or read it as an outline when you'd rather have a list.
Export as an image, save to your library, or turn the map into flashcards or a quiz.
03The standard
“Every node and relation is grounded in the classical library or well-established classical doctrine; when a node's content comes from a specific text, the source is carried in its note.”
Good to know
Prefers accuracy over density — it will not invent relationships to make the graph look fuller, so a sparse branch usually reflects sparse sourcing. A relationship that seems contestable between authorities deserves faculty review.
You choose — essentials (about a dozen nodes) up to a comprehensive map with two or three levels.
Yes — nodes drawn from a specific text carry that source in their note.
One account opens every tool, all sharing one credit pool.
Request access