The right dimensions
Definition, properties, seats, functions, clinical relevance — the rows examiners actually ask.
Clean, citable compare-and-contrast tables for exam favourites — Vāta vs Pitta vs Kapha, Āma vs Nirāma, and more.
01A session
Name two to five concepts to compare — doṣas, Āma vs Nirāma, Śodhana vs Śamana, an Ayurvedic vs biomedical view — or bring material over from another tool and let the ledger pick them.
The ledger chooses the dimensions examiners actually ask about, marks the high-yield rows, and names the mix-ups students actually make between the concepts.
Revise it in place (add a concept or a row), copy it out as Markdown or CSV, print it, or turn it into flashcards or a mnemonic.
Vāta · Pitta · Kapha
| Vāta | Pitta | Kapha | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahābhūta | Ākāśa + Vāyu | Agni + Jala | Pṛthvī + Jala |
| Chief seat | Pakvāśaya | Nābhi | Uras |
| Key guṇa | Rūkṣa, laghu, cala | Tīkṣṇa, uṣṇa, sara | Guru, snigdha, sthira |
| Best śodhana | Basti | Virecana | Vamana |
Common confusion: Pitta is sasneha — slightly unctuous — not rūkṣa.
02What sets it apart
Definition, properties, seats, functions, clinical relevance — the rows examiners actually ask.
The distinctions most likely to earn marks are highlighted, with common confusions called out.
Wide tables turn into one card per row on small screens.
Copy as Markdown or CSV, or print it for your notes.
03The standard
“Every cell is grounded in the classical library and classical texts with a sources list; any cell that reaches beyond the corpus is flagged rather than silently filled.”
Good to know
Cells are deliberately terse — table entries, not paragraphs — so nuance is compressed by design. Flagged cells, and any contrast on which authorities differ, deserve faculty review before they go into your exam notes.
Two to five — enough for a full table without losing clarity.
Yes — revise the table and it keeps what's there while adding what you ask for.
One account opens every tool, all sharing one credit pool.
Request access